Brandwashed

by Ryan M. Healy

in Blogging, Business, Psychology

You might wonder why I asked you to tell me your favorite brands a couple weeks ago. The reason I did this was to prove a point: brands are powerful.

In a world of information overload, brands are even more important. They give us a decision shortcut — a way to side-step all the choices we’re faced with every day.

We don’t evaluate dozens of different brands every time we go to buy a certain type of product. We do our evaluation once, maybe twice, then we default to our “brand of choice” for months, years, and possibly decades.

This is the power of a brand.

In a way, we are brainwashed… or brandwashed… to make certain buying decisions.

Does this mean that brand-name “image” advertising is good advertising? No. In fact, most image advertising is terrible. Yet brands thrive in spite of their advertising. The question is Why?

If you look at all the brands people listed as brands they love, you’ll find that most of them deliver more than just a product or service; they deliver a positive memorable experience.

For instance, Apple, Amazon, and Starbucks were all listed more than once. And all of them deliver an experience.

  • Apple offers a fun, low-stress environment where you can demo all their computers and ask as many questions as you want before you buy. (Of course, they have an amazing product, which doesn’t hurt either.)
  • Amazon offers a fast, convenient buying experience that is customized to you and your buying habits. Ordering is easy, prices are hard to beat, and Amazon’s personalized recommendations often lead you to new musicians and authors you would have otherwise never discovered.
  • Starbucks offers more than just coffee — they offer a pleasant environment where you can relax, read, study, visit with friends, or check your email. When you buy a cup of Starbucks coffee, you’re also buying ambiance.

Starbucks also showed up on my list. That’s because my wife and I used to go on dates at Starbucks. It was our favorite hang-out both before and after we got married. We’ve been going to the same Starbucks/Barnes & Noble combo for more than a decade now. That’s a lot of talks and a lot of memories.

So each time I support Starbucks, I’m buying not just the coffee (which I happen to like), I’m also buying my memories and all those good feelings I’ve associated with Starbucks.

In my view, people love brands that:

  • Create a (positive) memorable experience.
  • Stand for a certain value system or world view.

I believe a “memorable experience” is created primarily through one of two ways.

First, there is the experience that is designed to be extraordinary from the get-go. Take Disney, for instance. There’s nothing like it. And you’ll always remember the time you spend there because of that.

Second, there is the unexpected experience, usually in the form of outstanding customer service. This is why USAA showed up on my list. They’ve repeatedly given me excellent customer service. I haven’t experienced that anywhere else. So USAA stands out big time.

Now, here’s where it gets interesting because people hate brands for the same reasons they love them. We hate brands that…

  • Create a (negative) memorable experience.
  • Stand for a certain value system or world view.

Two examples…

Example #1: I hate Borders because I’ve repeatedly had bad experiences at their stores. And not just at one location — multiple locations. I was so upset by how I was treated at these stores that I literally “black-listed” them for years and refused to even step foot in one. Even today, years later, I will go out of my way to support their competitors.

Example #2: I strongly dislike Wal-Mart because of the values that run the company. Their approach to business is to save money at any cost — costs to the environment, costs to third-world countries, even costs to taxpayers. This is not what I believe in, so I intentionally avoid shopping at Wal-Mart.

So you see, we love and hate brands for essentially the same reasons. Interesting, eh?

Glenn Livingston dropped by and left an insightful comment. I’ve reproduced some of it here:

When I was a Fortune 500 consultant, we were involved with an advertising agency which wanted to promote the belief that people could define themselves by the three brands they absolutely couldn’t live without. They’d ask people what a typical day would be without those three brands. [...] Is your brand one of the 3 your customers couldn’t live without?

What a powerful question that is!

This is not to say we can all create “indespinsable brands” — but it’s certainly something worth striving for.

Remember: The more choices there are, the more important your brand is. Because a brand is how we shortcut the decision-making process. So, believe it or not, having a strong brand is important even for information marketers.

Case in point: How many blogs do you read on a daily/weekly/monthly basis?

I bet your daily blog list is short indeed. Maybe 3-7 blogs, max.

Taking a cue from Glenn, a good question to ask if you’re an information marketer might be, “Do I write one of the three blogs my customers couldn’t live without?”

Keep this in mind whenever you write blog posts… create information products… or do anything that defines (or refines) your brand.

-Ryan M. Healy

P.S. If you participated in my brand question from the previous post, thank you. It made this “thought experiment” much more interesting.




{ 7 comments }

2 Parth June 22, 2009 at 3:16 pm

Brand new, and I think I’m close to being hooked. This is indeed a great post! And one thing I ignored for years – what does my blog represent? I’ve found that putting out a free eBook is one of the QUICKEST ways to convert visitors into royal readers.

It also depends what your eBook has. It has to be somewhat personal, but also needs to give VALUABLE information that people can use that same day, right away. The shorter the ebook, the better.

With mine, to get them to come straight back to my blog, I made it so they have to come back to my blog in order to see the videos of all the exercises I put in my training manual. Based on your niche, your ebook should have a unique name – ebook, training manual, white papers, report – etc.

Sorry for the caps lock. I’ve been getting into a ton of copy writing and I now subconsiously write certain words in caps lock.

Once again, great post!I’m looking forward to reading your PDF. It seems like soemthing that will help me with my newsletter conversions.

3 Kevin Rogers June 23, 2009 at 6:06 am

Excellent post, Ryan.

It’s always interesting to me how certain people use their favorite brand to brand themselves.

You see this a lot with college football. You go to some folks houses and they’ve given over the decor to “Michigan blue” or “Roll Tide red”… creepy cult level loyalty.

That’s how powerful it is to recall a comfortable zone, though. Like the 40 yr-old dude who still has the same mini-mullet he sported in high school, some people just cling on to their happiest memories for dear life.

Interesting stuff.

And you’re right on about injecting a blog with some of that. The blogs that become my go-tos are the ones that transport me somewhere I’d rather to be.

Good read.

Kevin

4 Ryan M. Healy June 23, 2009 at 7:32 am

@Parth – Thanks for reading! Yes, a great way to get readers involved with your material is to give some of it away for free.

@Kevin – Thank you. Glad you enjoyed it. Funny that you mention mullets. I used to have a neighbor I called “mullet-man.” He was still living like it was 1985.

I have a theory about that…

People tend to dress like they did during the happiest period of their life. It’s almost like their happiest years are branded by the clothes they were wearing, music they were listening to, and cars they were driving. :-)

5 Glenn Livingston June 23, 2009 at 9:37 am

Ryan, I have to say it does my heart good to see a direct marketer writing about brand. I’ve always been rather annoyed at the dismissive attitude most Kennedy-ites have taken towards branding … as if it were something only big, dumb, stupid companies did when they were managed by people not spending their own money.

But like it or not, EVERY time you communicate with your customers, they’re developing a set of unique expectations for the benefits you deliver. And over time, when you consistently deliver a set of unique benefits, they tend to merge into a shorthand “image” or “persona” associated with your offerings.

So to me, the only question about branding is not whether it’s “smart or stupid”, but whether you’re going to take active and aggressive control over the brand image you develop in the market place, or whether you’ll leave it to happenstance and consumer whim.

Seems to me the only stupid thing about branding is ignoring it.

Notwithstanding the above, I WILL say many neophytes ignore the critical components of direct response (e.g. a measurable and repeatable call to action) in favor of brand image… and the entrepreneur really doesn’t have the resources to make this work.

It’s fine for Starbucks to advertise brand alone because people pass them every day on the street, and they’ve got enough money to say things LOUD and get their message through even if they waste a good part of their advertising dollar.

However, Joe Entrepreneur on a $5,000 advertising budget this year can’t afford to waste a penny, so he really needs to rely on direct response.

But that doesn’t mean ignoring brand image.

On the contrary, he’d better attend to both branding AND a measurable, repeatable response.

(See, you got me going on my soap box … that’ll teach you!)

My wife has a really cool white paper on common misconceptions of branding and emotional advertising at http://www.PositionYourBrand.com (feel free to delete this paragraph if it’s inappropriate to mention here, … I’ll take no offense)

Keep’m coming,

Dr. G :-)

7 Ryan M. Healy June 24, 2009 at 8:08 am

@Dr. G – I totally agree. Ignoring your brand is showing your ignorance. Because everybody has a brand. I’d prefer to be active with how my brand takes shape, rather than letting it just happen willy-nilly. Thanks again for reading (and commenting).

By the way, if I can get somebody on their soap box, I’ve done my job! ;-)

@Ben – Thanks for the RT love!

Comments on this entry are closed.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: