<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Frequent Blogging Encourage Bad Writing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/</link>
	<description>Ryan Healy on Copywriting, Advertising &#38; Business Growth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Donâ€™t Read This Unless You Want Tips On How To Write A Good Blog By Nanette Fondas - Majority Post</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-2588</link>
		<dc:creator>Donâ€™t Read This Unless You Want Tips On How To Write A Good Blog By Nanette Fondas - Majority Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/#comment-2588</guid>
		<description>[...] be sure, you can even link to other viewpoints. Your credibility skyrockets when you do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be sure, you can even link to other viewpoints. Your credibility skyrockets when you do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. A. Manley &#124; RealityCopywrting.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. A. Manley &#124; RealityCopywrting.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>Wow 34 comments. I&#039;m not surprised. When I saw the title on the sidebar I had to read it myself.

I currently have three blogs, and have written maney clients&#039; blogs also. As a general rule, I&#039;d agree, 3 a week does work well. Not too much or too little.

I think the 7 days a week thing is definitely burn out on both ends (reader and writer). But can work if kept short.

 5 times a week for some markets does work well. E.g., when I ran a blog showing naturopathic doctors how to market their clinic many LIVED for my daily email/blog post. They&#039;d print them out! A day without my message was a day not complete. I was part of their daily working life -- giving support and tips. It would be like one of their staff not showing up for work.

I think the 5 day a week works well if...

1. You keep them short. Less than 500 words. 700 max. So people know, upfront, it&#039;s only going to take a few minutes.

2. Really focus. Often I see blog posts that could easily be divided up into 2 or 3 posts and be better for it. Personally, I&#039;d rather read three 500 word posts than one 1,500. I personally really hack and save to cut mine down to 500. Though 700 is my limit.

3. Train your readers not to be overloaded with tons of lists. E.g., one short post/day isn&#039;t bad if you only read 3 blogs.

E.g. Seth Godin writes real short posts. Probably too short for me.

But the daily posts sure help build a relationship. Help create a conversation. E.g. short post, read feedback, respond, read feedback, respond. More like a conversation, than a publishing schedule. It&#039;s hard to have a conversation on a daily basis, no less a bi-daily basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow 34 comments. I&#8217;m not surprised. When I saw the title on the sidebar I had to read it myself.</p>
<p>I currently have three blogs, and have written maney clients&#8217; blogs also. As a general rule, I&#8217;d agree, 3 a week does work well. Not too much or too little.</p>
<p>I think the 7 days a week thing is definitely burn out on both ends (reader and writer). But can work if kept short.</p>
<p> 5 times a week for some markets does work well. E.g., when I ran a blog showing naturopathic doctors how to market their clinic many LIVED for my daily email/blog post. They&#8217;d print them out! A day without my message was a day not complete. I was part of their daily working life &#8212; giving support and tips. It would be like one of their staff not showing up for work.</p>
<p>I think the 5 day a week works well if&#8230;</p>
<p>1. You keep them short. Less than 500 words. 700 max. So people know, upfront, it&#8217;s only going to take a few minutes.</p>
<p>2. Really focus. Often I see blog posts that could easily be divided up into 2 or 3 posts and be better for it. Personally, I&#8217;d rather read three 500 word posts than one 1,500. I personally really hack and save to cut mine down to 500. Though 700 is my limit.</p>
<p>3. Train your readers not to be overloaded with tons of lists. E.g., one short post/day isn&#8217;t bad if you only read 3 blogs.</p>
<p>E.g. Seth Godin writes real short posts. Probably too short for me.</p>
<p>But the daily posts sure help build a relationship. Help create a conversation. E.g. short post, read feedback, respond, read feedback, respond. More like a conversation, than a publishing schedule. It&#8217;s hard to have a conversation on a daily basis, no less a bi-daily basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. A. Manley &#124; RealityCop</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-13555</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. A. Manley &#124; RealityCop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/#comment-13555</guid>
		<description>Wow 34 comments. I&#039;m not surprised. When I saw the title on the sidebar I had to read it myself.

I currently have three blogs, and have written maney clients&#039; blogs also. As a general rule, I&#039;d agree, 3 a week does work well. Not too much or too little.

I think the 7 days a week thing is definitely burn out on both ends (reader and writer). But can work if kept short.

 5 times a week for some markets does work well. E.g., when I ran a blog showing naturopathic doctors how to market their clinic many LIVED for my daily email/blog post. They&#039;d print them out! A day without my message was a day not complete. I was part of their daily working life -- giving support and tips. It would be like one of their staff not showing up for work.

I think the 5 day a week works well if...

1. You keep them short. Less than 500 words. 700 max. So people know, upfront, it&#039;s only going to take a few minutes.

2. Really focus. Often I see blog posts that could easily be divided up into 2 or 3 posts and be better for it. Personally, I&#039;d rather read three 500 word posts than one 1,500. I personally really hack and save to cut mine down to 500. Though 700 is my limit.

3. Train your readers not to be overloaded with tons of lists. E.g., one short post/day isn&#039;t bad if you only read 3 blogs.

E.g. Seth Godin writes real short posts. Probably too short for me.

But the daily posts sure help build a relationship. Help create a conversation. E.g. short post, read feedback, respond, read feedback, respond. More like a conversation, than a publishing schedule. It&#039;s hard to have a conversation on a daily basis, no less a bi-daily basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow 34 comments. I&#8217;m not surprised. When I saw the title on the sidebar I had to read it myself.</p>
<p>I currently have three blogs, and have written maney clients&#8217; blogs also. As a general rule, I&#8217;d agree, 3 a week does work well. Not too much or too little.</p>
<p>I think the 7 days a week thing is definitely burn out on both ends (reader and writer). But can work if kept short.</p>
<p> 5 times a week for some markets does work well. E.g., when I ran a blog showing naturopathic doctors how to market their clinic many LIVED for my daily email/blog post. They&#8217;d print them out! A day without my message was a day not complete. I was part of their daily working life &#8212; giving support and tips. It would be like one of their staff not showing up for work.</p>
<p>I think the 5 day a week works well if&#8230;</p>
<p>1. You keep them short. Less than 500 words. 700 max. So people know, upfront, it&#8217;s only going to take a few minutes.</p>
<p>2. Really focus. Often I see blog posts that could easily be divided up into 2 or 3 posts and be better for it. Personally, I&#8217;d rather read three 500 word posts than one 1,500. I personally really hack and save to cut mine down to 500. Though 700 is my limit.</p>
<p>3. Train your readers not to be overloaded with tons of lists. E.g., one short post/day isn&#8217;t bad if you only read 3 blogs.</p>
<p>E.g. Seth Godin writes real short posts. Probably too short for me.</p>
<p>But the daily posts sure help build a relationship. Help create a conversation. E.g. short post, read feedback, respond, read feedback, respond. More like a conversation, than a publishing schedule. It&#8217;s hard to have a conversation on a daily basis, no less a bi-daily basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/#comment-319</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

I think the gist of the sensible comments (emphasis on sensible) made here is this: the more you (or anybody) blog, the less valuable is your content, because ordinary people have a finite amount of information they can perceive, process, and communicate to others.

Compounding that, the less valuable your content, the less I&#039;m going to read what  you have to say.

Incidentally, the Bible was written by 40 different authors on 3 continents over a period of 1500 years, making it a ludicrous comparison.

I don&#039;t read everything you write in great detail, but I find enormous value in what I do read. 

Whatever you&#039;re doing, keep doing it.

Thanks.

Lisa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>I think the gist of the sensible comments (emphasis on sensible) made here is this: the more you (or anybody) blog, the less valuable is your content, because ordinary people have a finite amount of information they can perceive, process, and communicate to others.</p>
<p>Compounding that, the less valuable your content, the less I&#8217;m going to read what  you have to say.</p>
<p>Incidentally, the Bible was written by 40 different authors on 3 continents over a period of 1500 years, making it a ludicrous comparison.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t read everything you write in great detail, but I find enormous value in what I do read. </p>
<p>Whatever you&#8217;re doing, keep doing it.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Lisa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-13554</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/#comment-13554</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

I think the gist of the sensible comments (emphasis on sensible) made here is this: the more you (or anybody) blog, the less valuable is your content, because ordinary people have a finite amount of information they can perceive, process, and communicate to others.

Compounding that, the less valuable your content, the less I&#039;m going to read what  you have to say.

Incidentally, the Bible was written by 40 different authors on 3 continents over a period of 1500 years, making it a ludicrous comparison.

I don&#039;t read everything you write in great detail, but I find enormous value in what I do read. 

Whatever you&#039;re doing, keep doing it.

Thanks.

Lisa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>I think the gist of the sensible comments (emphasis on sensible) made here is this: the more you (or anybody) blog, the less valuable is your content, because ordinary people have a finite amount of information they can perceive, process, and communicate to others.</p>
<p>Compounding that, the less valuable your content, the less I&#8217;m going to read what  you have to say.</p>
<p>Incidentally, the Bible was written by 40 different authors on 3 continents over a period of 1500 years, making it a ludicrous comparison.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t read everything you write in great detail, but I find enormous value in what I do read. </p>
<p>Whatever you&#8217;re doing, keep doing it.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Lisa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan M. Healy</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M. Healy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Christine - Thanks for leaving a comment. My primary thrust is that too-frequent posting often encourages bad writing. This is not to say all blogs that post daily are bad.

I can think of one blog in particular that averages 5-8 posts a week, and it is one of my favorites. This blog has nothing to do with business, Internet marketing, money, etc.

Nobody else writes about the stuff this guy writes about, which is one reason I&#039;m such a loyal reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christine &#8211; Thanks for leaving a comment. My primary thrust is that too-frequent posting often encourages bad writing. This is not to say all blogs that post daily are bad.</p>
<p>I can think of one blog in particular that averages 5-8 posts a week, and it is one of my favorites. This blog has nothing to do with business, Internet marketing, money, etc.</p>
<p>Nobody else writes about the stuff this guy writes about, which is one reason I&#8217;m such a loyal reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan M. Healy</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-13553</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M. Healy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/#comment-13553</guid>
		<description>Christine - Thanks for leaving a comment. My primary thrust is that too-frequent posting often encourages bad writing. This is not to say all blogs that post daily are bad.

I can think of one blog in particular that averages 5-8 posts a week, and it is one of my favorites. This blog has nothing to do with business, Internet marketing, money, etc.

Nobody else writes about the stuff this guy writes about, which is one reason I&#039;m such a loyal reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christine &#8211; Thanks for leaving a comment. My primary thrust is that too-frequent posting often encourages bad writing. This is not to say all blogs that post daily are bad.</p>
<p>I can think of one blog in particular that averages 5-8 posts a week, and it is one of my favorites. This blog has nothing to do with business, Internet marketing, money, etc.</p>
<p>Nobody else writes about the stuff this guy writes about, which is one reason I&#8217;m such a loyal reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Well--the majority of the time I would agree with you.

However--I subscribe to one blog that is posted about 6 times a week--and is my favorite.  (It&#039;s also a personal blog--not business)  She writes these charming stories--taken from her life--in the third person.  

It didn&#039;t take long for me to miss it on the days that she doesn&#039;t post!!!

Now me on the other hand--most of my posts are spontaneous--and very erratic.   I actually like the spontaneous part--but I need to find a way to make them a little more regular.

take care,
Christine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8211;the majority of the time I would agree with you.</p>
<p>However&#8211;I subscribe to one blog that is posted about 6 times a week&#8211;and is my favorite.  (It&#8217;s also a personal blog&#8211;not business)  She writes these charming stories&#8211;taken from her life&#8211;in the third person.  </p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t take long for me to miss it on the days that she doesn&#8217;t post!!!</p>
<p>Now me on the other hand&#8211;most of my posts are spontaneous&#8211;and very erratic.   I actually like the spontaneous part&#8211;but I need to find a way to make them a little more regular.</p>
<p>take care,<br />
Christine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-13552</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/#comment-13552</guid>
		<description>Well--the majority of the time I would agree with you.

However--I subscribe to one blog that is posted about 6 times a week--and is my favorite.  (It&#039;s also a personal blog--not business)  She writes these charming stories--taken from her life--in the third person.  

It didn&#039;t take long for me to miss it on the days that she doesn&#039;t post!!!

Now me on the other hand--most of my posts are spontaneous--and very erratic.   I actually like the spontaneous part--but I need to find a way to make them a little more regular.

take care,
Christine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8211;the majority of the time I would agree with you.</p>
<p>However&#8211;I subscribe to one blog that is posted about 6 times a week&#8211;and is my favorite.  (It&#8217;s also a personal blog&#8211;not business)  She writes these charming stories&#8211;taken from her life&#8211;in the third person.  </p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t take long for me to miss it on the days that she doesn&#8217;t post!!!</p>
<p>Now me on the other hand&#8211;most of my posts are spontaneous&#8211;and very erratic.   I actually like the spontaneous part&#8211;but I need to find a way to make them a little more regular.</p>
<p>take care,<br />
Christine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does More Equal Less? &#171; MarketingMoment.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Does More Equal Less? &#171; MarketingMoment.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/does-frequent-blogging-encourage-bad-writing/#comment-311</guid>
		<description>[...] Ryan Healey&#8217;s recent post, &#8216;Does Frequent Blogging Encourage Bad Writing?&#8216;, is brewing up a healthy debate in cyberblog land. In particular, with regards to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ryan Healey&#8217;s recent post, &#8216;Does Frequent Blogging Encourage Bad Writing?&#8216;, is brewing up a healthy debate in cyberblog land. In particular, with regards to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

