<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Like Your Plain Language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ryanhealy.com/i-like-your-plain-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/i-like-your-plain-language/</link>
	<description>Ryan Healy on Copywriting, Advertising &#38; Business Growth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Shanika Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/i-like-your-plain-language/comment-page-1/#comment-9424</link>
		<dc:creator>Shanika Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/?p=727#comment-9424</guid>
		<description>I most certainly agree. As long as I keep my messages, simple, to the point, and with empathy, I will always get a response. I do this two ways though:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) I visualize that I am talking to a friend across the table at a coffee shop. In this perspective, my messages come out as conversations. I avoid the lingo and just write out how I would talk to my friends and family. Isn&#039;t our conversations very simple and easy to understand in that kind of atmosphere?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) I also think as if I am writing to an person I haven&#039;t seen in years. Think about someone you were really close to. You have some news you want to tell them or just update them on how things are. That type of writing is more emotion based, simple and easy to read as well. The bonus to this is it can also get very descriptive and full of detail. After all, you don&#039;t wanna leave any information out if it&#039;s important for that friend to know, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopes this adds to the topic. Later everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I most certainly agree. As long as I keep my messages, simple, to the point, and with empathy, I will always get a response. I do this two ways though:</p>
<p>1) I visualize that I am talking to a friend across the table at a coffee shop. In this perspective, my messages come out as conversations. I avoid the lingo and just write out how I would talk to my friends and family. Isn&#39;t our conversations very simple and easy to understand in that kind of atmosphere?</p>
<p>2) I also think as if I am writing to an person I haven&#39;t seen in years. Think about someone you were really close to. You have some news you want to tell them or just update them on how things are. That type of writing is more emotion based, simple and easy to read as well. The bonus to this is it can also get very descriptive and full of detail. After all, you don&#39;t wanna leave any information out if it&#39;s important for that friend to know, right?</p>
<p>Hopes this adds to the topic. Later everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shanika Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/i-like-your-plain-language/comment-page-1/#comment-7083</link>
		<dc:creator>Shanika Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/?p=727#comment-7083</guid>
		<description>I most certainly agree. As long as I keep my messages, simple, to the point, and with empathy, I will always get a response. I do this two ways though:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) I visualize that I am talking to a friend across the table at a coffee shop. In this perspective, my messages come out as conversations. I avoid the lingo and just write out how I would talk to my friends and family. Isn&#039;t our conversations very simple and easy to understand in that kind of atmosphere?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) I also think as if I am writing to an person I haven&#039;t seen in years. Think about someone you were really close to. You have some news you want to tell them or just update them on how things are. That type of writing is more emotion based, simple and easy to read as well. The bonus to this is it can also get very descriptive and full of detail. After all, you don&#039;t wanna leave any information out if it&#039;s important for that friend to know, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopes this adds to the topic. Later everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I most certainly agree. As long as I keep my messages, simple, to the point, and with empathy, I will always get a response. I do this two ways though:</p>
<p>1) I visualize that I am talking to a friend across the table at a coffee shop. In this perspective, my messages come out as conversations. I avoid the lingo and just write out how I would talk to my friends and family. Isn&#39;t our conversations very simple and easy to understand in that kind of atmosphere?</p>
<p>2) I also think as if I am writing to an person I haven&#39;t seen in years. Think about someone you were really close to. You have some news you want to tell them or just update them on how things are. That type of writing is more emotion based, simple and easy to read as well. The bonus to this is it can also get very descriptive and full of detail. After all, you don&#39;t wanna leave any information out if it&#39;s important for that friend to know, right?</p>
<p>Hopes this adds to the topic. Later everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/i-like-your-plain-language/comment-page-1/#comment-7079</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/?p=727#comment-7079</guid>
		<description>Nice post - Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication. - Leonardo da Vinci</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post &#8211; Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication. &#8211; Leonardo da Vinci</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Healy</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/i-like-your-plain-language/comment-page-1/#comment-7075</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Healy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/?p=727#comment-7075</guid>
		<description>Jude - Even though Claude Hopkins wrote way back in the 1920s, I find his writing to be very plain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I intentionally try to write as plainly as he did. If you read My Life in Advertising or Scientific Advertising, you&#039;ll see what I mean. Good style to emulate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jude &#8211; Even though Claude Hopkins wrote way back in the 1920s, I find his writing to be very plain.</p>
<p>I intentionally try to write as plainly as he did. If you read My Life in Advertising or Scientific Advertising, you&#39;ll see what I mean. Good style to emulate.</p>
<p>Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/i-like-your-plain-language/comment-page-1/#comment-7071</link>
		<dc:creator>John Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/?p=727#comment-7071</guid>
		<description>Jude - You might want to look for &quot;The Art of Plain Talk&quot; by Rudolf Flesch.  If I remember right, Ted Nicholas recommends this book in his seminars, and I have heard that David Ogilvie recommended this book, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Otherwise, you might want to deliberately read authors that appeal to a very big audience.  You might want to read Hemmingway or Stephen King.  I&#039;m not a big fan of either (probably has something to do with their choice of subjects), but, generally, you will find their style of writing to be very down-to-earth and plain-spoken.  I will say that I do very much like King&#039;s &quot;On Writing.&quot;  I have the unabridged audio, and that gives you a nice feel for how plain writing (or speaking) can sound and feel.  I will pre-warn you about the language in the book, though.  It&#039;s in there.  Not for the kiddies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ryan - Great post, as usual, and a great reminder about what our jobs are. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jude &#8211; You might want to look for &#8220;The Art of Plain Talk&#8221; by Rudolf Flesch.  If I remember right, Ted Nicholas recommends this book in his seminars, and I have heard that David Ogilvie recommended this book, too.</p>
<p>Otherwise, you might want to deliberately read authors that appeal to a very big audience.  You might want to read Hemmingway or Stephen King.  I&#39;m not a big fan of either (probably has something to do with their choice of subjects), but, generally, you will find their style of writing to be very down-to-earth and plain-spoken.  I will say that I do very much like King&#39;s &#8220;On Writing.&#8221;  I have the unabridged audio, and that gives you a nice feel for how plain writing (or speaking) can sound and feel.  I will pre-warn you about the language in the book, though.  It&#39;s in there.  Not for the kiddies.</p>
<p>Ryan &#8211; Great post, as usual, and a great reminder about what our jobs are. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jude</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanhealy.com/i-like-your-plain-language/comment-page-1/#comment-7067</link>
		<dc:creator>Jude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanhealy.com/?p=727#comment-7067</guid>
		<description>Any books, guides or suggestions on how to learn how to write plain language? Or in other words, how to un-learn corporate speak?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any books, guides or suggestions on how to learn how to write plain language? Or in other words, how to un-learn corporate speak?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
