The Curse of Opportunity

by Ryan M. Healy

in Business, Mindset, Success

Opportunity is both a blessing and a curse.

The problem with opportunity is not that there is too little of it, but rather that there is too much. We are awash in opportunity to the point of confusion and indecision.

Should I do this or that? Go here or there?

The questions are endless.

Anymore, the goal is not find an opportunity. That’s easy. Now the goal is to determine which one or two or three opportunities out of hundreds are worth your time, energy, and dedication.

Because the price of pursuing a mediocre opportunity can be high indeed.

It may only cost you the difference between what a mediocre and great opportunity produce. Or if the mediocre opportunity doesn’t pan out — a common occurence — then it may have been better to have never pursued it in the first place.

Here are some ways to judge the value of almost any business opportunity. Give yourself points or take them away according to your answer.

A Brief Non-Scientific Method for Analyzing Opportunities

1. Will this opportunity pay you money this week or this month?

If so, add +5.

2. If there is no guarantee this opportunity will pay immediately, can you take a specific action today that will produce a positive, measurable financial result? (A “positive, measurable financial result” means money in your pocket, not potential money in your pocket.)

If yes, add +3; if no, subtract -2.

3. Does this opportunity leverage your strongest skills, talents, and abilities?

If yes, add +3; if no, subtract -2.

4. How soon and how frequently will this opportunity pay you money?

  • Ongoing starting now, then add +5.
  • Ongoing starting at 3 months, then add +1.
  • Ongoing starting at 6 months, then subtract -2.
  • One time pay-off now, then add +4.
  • One time pay-off in 3 months, then add 0.
  • One time pay-off in 6 months, then subtract -3.

5. If this opportunity is being presented to you by another person, how much potential money has been pitched to you?

  • $100,000 or more, then subtract -10.
  • $50,000 to $100,000, then subtract -6.
  • $10,000 to $50,000, then subtract -3.
  • $5,000 to $10,000, then subtract -1.
  • $0 to $5,000, then add 0.

In general, the more money you’re promised… and the farther out the potential pay-off… the worse the opportunity is.

And, in general, the more modest the pay-off… and the more quickly you get paid… the better the opportunity is.

That’s why, this past year, I’ve developed a personal business strategy that says:

“Follow the Money.”

Which is to say, invest the majority of your time and energy into project and clients that pay you today — instead of projects and clients that might pay you at some distant (undetermined) point in the future.

Will this little test I’ve devised be appropriate for analyzing every opportunity that comes along?

Probably not.

But it should at least give you a good feel for the relative value of the opportunities you’re looking at. I hope you find it useful.

-Ryan M. Healy

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
  • Note Taking Nerd #2,

    That's a good point you make, but I believe in some cases we just have to look at the aspect of immediate payout like Ryan suggested.

    For instance, I've got a few clients who have paid me in the range of $6,000-$8,000 for the project. All these guys have businesses that are doing very well, but they just haven't worked with many copywriters before.

    So in cases like this, probably the two things we should look at are:
    a) can they pay?
    b) are they used to paying out money to get their business tasks done?

    IMHO, if a business persons understands the importance of hiring expert professionals for each task, then he will most definitely understand the importance of a copywriter and what he does.

    That's what I feel anyway.

    Regards,

    Dean Dhuli.
    http://HighPowerCopy.com/
  • @Simi - Yes, I suppose for some people a job opportunity might be a factor. It's always a calculation of risk vs. reward.

    Personally, I feel like most jobs are risky and have low reward. I'd rather be self-employed, and I am.

    That's really the perspective from which I created the test -- which clients/projects should receive the most attention?
  • Great equation Ryan! I brings home the difference between tinkering continuously with my site and creating a new product.

    One caveat, the equation also tells me to stop working on making money online and go back to the corporate world...
  • @Note Taking Nerd - Good point. If a person can't produce some solid business references, they're likely not a good person to do business with.
  • Love the thought put into this equation Ryan.

    And sometimes a lazy dude like me looks for shortcuts. For instance, I listen to my goals while doing yoga.

    Master practitioners would balk at this saying you need to "listen" to your body fully but there's so many things I want to do with my day, so I look to save time when I can.

    Here's a way to save time with your suggestion.

    Before crunching these numbers consider this...

    If you haven't done business with this person before, request the names of at least 3 people they've done business with before and would gleefully do so again.

    If they can't come up with 3, or even 1, what makes you think you'll be the first?

    When you work with a Boardroom, Agora or Healthy Directions, these companies know their bread is buttered by copy.

    So, the last thing they want is for star talent to avoid them.

    Therefore their business systems are highly efficient. They get stuff done. If you write for them you're all but guaranteed your letter is gonna mail. Even if it isn't you've at least been paid to write it.

    These direct marketing giants have solid track records you can depend on.

    But when you write for Joe business start up, he may be years away from having the belief systems that allow him to take action effectively.

    The only way you know is to ask for proof.

    And if this person gets offended or starts sttuddering when you request the names of 3 people who'd vouch for their integrity it might be a sign for you to run, not walk away.

    Robert Ringer, then Dan Kennedy and then Eben Pagan throughout the years have reinforced in my mind that smooth talkers aren't usually smooth doers.

    Keep this in mind and this golden equation may gather dust in between uses.

    Note Taking Nerd #2
    www.mynotetakingnerd.wordpress.com
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: